You can bypass the srv records if you like by passing a :port with the hostname where you use it in freeswitch.
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Carlos S. Antunes wrote: > Hello! > > I am using Callcentric for my tests and have observed what appears > to me > a possible bug in the way Freeswitch handles DNS SRV records. > > Callcentric uses DNS SRV records as a way to direct traffic to their > SIP > server. A 'srv' 'dig' of '_sip._udp.callcentric.com' returns: > > _sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 > alpha6.callcentric.com. > _sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 > alpha7.callcentric.com. > _sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 > alpha1.callcentric.com. > _sip._udp.callcentric.com. 10025 IN SRV 20 7 5080 > alpha3.callcentric.com. > > Based on this information, Freeswitch appears to correctly round robin > all available IP addresses except in a particular situation: in the > middle of authorizations. > > For example, in a registration, Freeswitch send a packet to > alpha1.callcentric.com. Callcentric then challenges Freeswitch with a > Proxy Authorization request. Freeswitch then sends the packet with the > requested credentials but not necessarily to alpha1.callcentric.com! > In > many cases, instead of sticking to the 'challenging' server, > Freeswitch > round robins and sends the second packet to, one of the other servers. > This continues for a little while and eventually, simply by luck, the > second packet is sent to the 'challenging' Callcentric server. > > Shouldn't Freeswitch stick to the same server when challenged for > credentials? Is this a bug? Is there a way to make Freeswitch behave > differently? > > Thanks! > > Carlos Antunes > Nowthor Corporation _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org