I would love to see this work in tree, but i am pretty sure it has never worked. I would gladly accept patches that implement this.
Mike On Oct 14, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Simon J Mudd wrote: > br...@freeswitch.org (Brian West) writes: > >> You shouldn't have to make clean usually ... doing so might break >> your >> tree... > > Why? > > In any case on my mac (Leopard) neither make clean or distclean fully > cleans up afterwards. I would prefer to get a completely "untouched" > source tree after doing this. If that's supposed to work and I should > post a bug or report the problem in more detail then I can do that. > >> You can usually get by with "make current" that will ensure >> the critical things are cleaned and built correctly... every now and >> they you'll hit a snafu but we'll usually tell you about it. > > ok. That's one of the reasons for liking to use VPATH builds. It's > also > why many BSD system builds use this so that you can mount the source > tree readonly (perhaps from another server) and build the binaries > in a separate directory independently. > > If that's not supported then that's fine. > > I was trying to build the latest svn version of freeswitch (Revision: > 15138) and this didn't build. As I'm not too familiar with compiling > at least on the Mac I thought I'd first try to see if a VPATH build > would work better. I'll have to try and investigate further. _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
