There is no such thing as freeswitch 1.5. Have you tried latest svn
trunk to see if this behavior is the same?
Mike
On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Lei Tang <lei.tl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I'm using FS 1.5, doesn't somebody known something about
this problem?
My scenario is :
A(FreeSwitch) B
------INVITE ------->
<----100 Tring--------
<----180 Ring -------- with sdp m=audio 55066 RTP/AVP 0 120
c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
<----UPDATE ------- with sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120
c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
-----200 OK ------> response for UPDATE message
<---- 200 OK-------- response for INVITE message, with
sdp m=audio 45486 RTP/AVP 0 120 c=IN IP4 10.36.143.76
--------ACK --------->
The problem is, B changed the rtp port in UPDATE message and "200
OK" response message, but FS didn't do update , so it still send and
receive data from port 55066.
Is this a bug in FS? Does someone known something about this
problem? Any advice is appreciated!
--
Lei.Tang
lei.tl...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-
users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
