This means there was no sdp sent. Did you confirm this with siptrace?
On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Lei Tang <lei.tl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brian, I don't think so, I have debuged fs, If I'm not wrong,
following code in sofia.c send the 200ok response
sofia.c
function sofia_handle_sip_i_state ....
.........
switch(ss_state)
................
case nua_callstate_received:
.....................
else if (tech_pvt && sofia_test_flag(tech_pvt,
TFLAG_SDP) && !r_sdp) {
nua_respond(tech_pvt->nh, SIP_200_OK, TAG_END());
sofia_set_flag_locked(tech_pvt,
TFLAG_NOSDP_REINVITE);
goto done;
}
The cause is r_sdp is null, but I don't known why tl_gets don't
return remote sdp tag, it's quite strange.
2009/12/29 Brian West <br...@freeswitch.org>
the 200ok is not from FS.. its from the end point... so its not us
thats not putting the SDP into the 200ok but the device you're
talking to because in proxy media they are passed as is.
/b
On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Lei Tang wrote:
> Hi Brian, thanks for your help, I am using FS in proxy media mode.
the sip agent I'm using is x-lite and wxCommunicator.
> I will test if trunk 16055 work when I set proxy media mode to
false tomorrow.
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-
users
http://www.freeswitch.org
--
Lei.Tang
lei.tl...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-
users
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org
