On 9 May 2012 07:42, Bruce Perens <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/08/2012 11:40 PM, David Rowe wrote: >> >> Good work Bruce. The audio 925 mile path was with known test data (so I >> could calculate the bit error rate at the rx). Hmm, but it might be >> possible to extract the bit error pattern and apply that to Codec 2 >> data. > > Or you can have the guys repeat the test with real audio.
Well, I see there is alpha source code there. So I may look into creating a test sequence (callsign and a short message) and effectively sked on here with my fellow Europeans and see if anyone can pick it up and decode it. Hopefully some people will now jump on and agree to listen out for me if I do so :) I don't have a very good HF antenna setup at all right now (by which I mean it's made up of speaker wire running into the garden). But, get favourable results on 30/40m, less so on 20m. So should hopefully get something. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
