Hi all,
Sorry for my late input on this. I've been a bit busy on upgrading my
license over here (and continue to be, for the final stage too, until
probably the end of the year).
As it is, I think for normal QSO mode, probably golay1224 or 1223 will be
of most use. Simply to keep the latency down. I think I read someone
already suggest this. Just putting my vote in too.
If there are to be "DX" profiles as Kristoff suggested, perhaps the
specification for these can have built in, a longer stream based FEC for
better reliability.
Deciding which bits, looking at other topics in the list, I think the
program written by Jim is a great tool. I think I saw a message from
Kristoff saying he's been discussing it already. Which is a good thing.
Eventually I'd still like to get written up the specification for the
VHF/UHF finished. I think already there's many many changes to how I saw it
in my head originally. However, I won't have much time at all for the
remainder of the year, due to studying for the UK full license in most of
my spare time. So, if someone else does want to take it over, I won't feel
hurt or upset about it :) I think though, the test implementation can
happen before documentation. So hopefully everything can fit in together
somehow.
Best regards,
Peter, 2E0PZK (was M6DGI).
On 24 October 2012 23:17, David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Given what Jean-Marc wrote about the first VQ index, it probably rates
> > > higher than energy.
> > If David and/or Steve can confirm this; it makes sence to incorperate
> > this in the search for a good interleaver.
>
> It's best to test the relative sensitivity of the different codec
> parameters. So set up the FEC/interleaving so that we can evaluate
> different schemes, apply say 1-5% random errors and listen to the
> results for a few test sentences.
>
> The index assignment Jean-Marc suggested may provide as much improvement
> as FEC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
