Bookmarked tnx David !

73

/M.

On 24 September 2015 at 10:26, David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yep, I thought it worth blogging on as I keep forgetting it myself:
>
>    http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=4621
>
> Have some other ideas for more later....
>
> - David
>
> On 24/09/15 10:19, Matthew Cook wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Why can I see a discussion paper or magazine article entitled "do you
> > know your Eb/No?"  *grin*.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Matthew
> > VK5ZM
> >
> > On 24 September 2015 at 05:46, David Rowe <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Nice work on the power measurement Helmut :-)
> >
> >     I wanted to say a little about 0dB SNR and below operation.  In the
> >     attached plot, the lower three curves show the performance of modems
> >     in AWGN channel - a channel that just has additive noise (like a
> >     very slow fading HF channel or VHF).
> >
> >     These curves show how much energy/bit (Eb/No) we need for a certain
> >     Bit Error Rate (BER).
> >
> >     The Blue curve just above the Red (ideal QPSK) perf is our modem in
> >     a AWGN channel.  Time for some math:
> >
> >     The energy/bit Eb = power/bit rate = S/Rb
> >     The total noise the demod sees is No (noise power in 1Hz) multiplied
> >     by the bandwidth B, N=NoB
> >
> >     Re-arranging a bit we get:
> >
> >        SNR = S/N = EbRb/NoB
> >
> >     or in dB:
> >
> >        SNR(db) = Eb/No(dB) + 10log10(Rb/B)
> >
> >     Now Rb = 700, B = 3000 Hz (for SNR in a 3000Hz bandwidth) so we get:
> >
> >        SNR = Eb/No - 6.3
> >
> >     Now, say we need a BER of 2% or 0.02 for speech, the lower blue
> >     curve says we need an Eb/No = 4dB, so we get:
> >
> >        SNR = 4 - 6.3 = -2.3dB
> >
> >     So if the modem is working down to "just" 0dB we are about 2dB worse
> >     than theoretical.  This is due to the extra bandwidth taken by the
> >     pilot symbols (which translates to 1.5dB) and some implementation
> >     loss in the sync algorithms, and non linearities in the system.
> >
> >     I thought it worth explaining this a little more.  These skills will
> >     be just as important to Hams of the 21st century as Ohms law was in
> >     the 20th.
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >     David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 23/09/15 18:04, Helmut wrote:
> >
> >         Hi Glen,
> >
> >         Very difficult question, hi! I left the commercial arena more
> >         than 12 years
> >         ago, so that have to use my old mixed surplus test equipment,
> >         certainly not
> >         competitive with today's requirements, but good enough for ham
> >         radio.
> >         The old R&S RMS-Powermeter with a tru-sensor provides a nominal
> >         accuracy of
> >         +/- 5 %. A PEP- module for this RMS meter offers similar
> >         accuracy for
> >         sinusoidal waveforms. From time to time I check the R&S meter
> >         with my (old)
> >         HP 435A and a reference circuit.
> >         The most accurate test equipment is finally my HPSDR setup. The
> >         feedback
> >         loop for the pre-distortion delivers an exact and well defined
> >         portion of
> >         the TX power to the RX input in real-time. As the ADC is driven
> >         to full
> >         scale or in minimum 15 dB below the failure is within +/- 0.3 dB
> >         for average
> >         or PEP indication (total dynamic range > 120 dB).
> >         For the exciting tests with Alfred, HB9EPU, to get a feeling how
> >         capable
> >         freeDV at small SNRs is, I always watch the displayed spectrum
> >         of the
> >         incoming signal. The FFT bin width is 2,93 Hz, that means that a
> >         signal is
> >         still visible, but no longer audible after processing in the
> phones.
> >         Therefore it was amazing, that freeDV seems to produce reasonable
> >         readability still with SNR =0 dB.
> >
> >         73, Helmut
> >
> >         p.s. No experience with AD8362. Boonton (Wireless Telecom Group)
> >         offers a
> >         nice USB Peak Power Sensor.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >         Von: glen english [mailto:[email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>]
> >         Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 01:26
> >         An: [email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>
> >         Betreff: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Tuning Aid 700B mode
> >
> >         Helmut
> >         How well does your power meter respond to high peak to average
> >         signals,
> >         IE faithfully measuring peak and PEP ? I've been involved in
> >         this with
> >         DRM and DVB.
> >
> >         something to watch, anyway.
> >         Maybe use a TRUPWR (R) device like the AD8362 to measure it.
> >
> >         73
> >
> >
> >         On 23/09/2015 5:58 AM, wully wrote:
> >
> >             Hi all
> >
> >             Helmut, dc6ny, and I have done some more tests yesterday.
> >             The band
> >             starts opening again (wonderful: we always want to test
> 700B).
> >             As stated earlier, we never had any problem with the
> >             700B-tuning: cohpsk
> >             locks quicker than the fdmdv, at least, this is the
> >             impression we get
> >             from our experiences. Yesterday, I started to reduce my
> >             power (measured
> >             by an LP-100A just before the antenna coupler) when txing in
> >             700B.
> >             Helmut detected the signal and I reported about my power
> >             seting: Full
> >             drive started with 58Watts peak. Then I reduced the power to
> >             100mW peak
> >             (reading the quickly changing "average"  of LP-100A). This
> >             was the last
> >             setting, that I could read on the LP-100A, my relative
> >             powerseting was
> >             at 7 out of 256. Then I reduced to 6, then to 5, to 4, to 3,
> >             to 2. After
> >             this experiment, Helmut reported, that he could fully decode
> >             the signal
> >             at 6, but at 5 only about 50% and lower no decoding anymore.
> We
> >             estimated, that setting 6 was about 50 mWatt.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >         --
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> >         [email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>
> >         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> >
> >
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >         Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> >         Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> >         in one place.
> >         SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of
> >         Datadog now!
> >         http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> >         [email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>
> >         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> >
> >
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> >     Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> >     in one place.
> >     SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog
> now!
> >     http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> >     [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> > Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> > in one place.
> > SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> in one place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
in one place.
SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to