I am hoping there will be some people on this list far more experienced than me to be able to advise on this!

Am playing with VHF voice, etc, and I am thinking what is the best way to get ultra-reliable (super-sensitive) performance on a VHF modem.

I am thinking for VHF, based on a radio where only a normal FM modulator with a Class C PA is available, so it would have to be something like 4FSK. Bandwidth isn't a huge problem (say 12.5khz is available which gives loads of headroom for 1000 baud Codec2).

Is it better to run 4FSK at a low baud rate (say using one of the low baud rate versions of the codec), then have just a little error correction, on the basis that low baud = narrow IF = sensitive, or is it better to run at a high baud, really heavy on the error correction, such as 4800 baud and then have loads of error correction such that the actual throughput is only 1000 baud?

Basically which would work better - 4800baud air with 1000 baud after error correction, or 1200 baud air with 1000 baud after error correction?

This would be assuming 4m band (70mhz) where Rayleigh fading isn't very predominant.


Also, I know it becomes the law of diminishing returns between 4FSK, 8FSK, 16FSK, etc, and it is generally felt that 4FSK is the most reliable, but is there any advantage to spacing the tones further apart except from a small "guard band" would help prevent interference between the tones. Presumably if the tones start to get really spaced out then there is absolutely no advantage because you just waste spectrum with huge guard bands for the 4 filters on receive.

I know that the work so far on Codec 2 has been based on low baud, low error correction, but I am wondering if this equals best sensitivity or if this is more about bandwidth efficiency.


I just wondering best way to get really sensitive comms, so a 5W HT could go for miles and miles.

Sam
M1FJB





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to