On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Clemens Koller wrote: > Hi, Behdad! > > Great! Does your Patch solve the necessity of the -fno-strict-aliasing also?
That's the only thing it's supposed to do. > As my build is currently working (as mentioned below) I wouldn't expect any > changes with your patch with -fno-strict... > > Where is the Patch (from Werner) which added the -fno-strict-aliasing? It's a couple lines in builds/unix/configure.ac, but my patch contains that. > Can I get it, revert it and retry from the latest CVS? > I might do it manually, but I might do it different. What would be good to do is to get latest CVS, apply my patch, build and see whether it works. > Greets, > > Clemens Koller Thanks, behdad > R&D Imaging Devices > Anagramm GmbH > Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 > 81379 Muenchen > Germany > > http://www.anagramm.de > Phone: +49-89-741518-50 > Fax: +49-89-741518-19 > > Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Clemens Koller wrote: > > > > > >>For me, the -fno-strict-aliasing seems to solve the > >>problem or at least the illegal instruction bug. > >>In my point of view is this just a workaround for > >>some code problems there. > > > > > > Did you see my recent patch for that? Would you please test? > > > > --behdad > > http://behdad.org/ > > > > --behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
