On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:38:54 +0200 "Turner, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In summary, I will replace "NULL" in the part by "0L". >> How do you think of? >> > >I think you should only use "0", since this is a magic token for C compilers >that can be interpreted either as an integer or as a pointer, depending on >context. Thank you for information! OK, I'll do so: I'll use "0", not "0L" nor "NULL". Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
