--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Although I could find no softwares that calls it, > ft_validator_run() is published function, so I > replaced all calling of ft_validator_run() by > ft_setjmp(). > > I think left ft_validator_run() should be replaced > by some warning-only functions. To avoid unexpected > crashing, it should not call ft_setjmp(). > Jens, how do you think? >
I suggest we remove ft_validator_run() from the librarys exports altogether, it simply does not work reliably. If we replace it with function that issues a warning, no one will notice it. By removing the function people are forced to recompile their application and thus remove a bug from it. Inconvenient, but necessary I think. And I guess not too many applications use it anyway as you found out yourself. Jens __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
