Sean McBride wrote:
ft_strcpy, ft_strncpy -> strlcpy ft_strcat -> strlcat
Neither are currently included in glibc (and some effort with google seems to indicate this is likely to stay this way for the foreseeable future), and so if freetype wants to use those it would have to maintain it's own variants of them.
Uses of ft_strcpy and ft_strcat could also be replaced with the strn* varieties, which would be some improvement.
Tom Parker -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tevp.net Illegitimus non carborundum _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
