Dear Sirs, Thank you for correcting my misunderstanding.
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:39:43 +0800 "Jjgod Jiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/3/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Excuse me, please let me alter the phraseology: > Mac OS X 10.4.x on Intel Mac can execute 64bit Intel Mac binary? Yes, I can confirm that, Intel Core 2 Duo (now all upgraded MacBook Pro, MacBook and iMac using) is 64-bit CPU. Xcode Tools support generating x86_64 binaries since version 2.4.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:23:37 -0400 "Sean McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07 1:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >it is possible that ppc64 Carbon is still missing in future. No. Apple has already said that 64 bit Carbon will be for both Intel and PPC. See: <http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/64bit.html>
Just I've updated ftconfig.in and ftconfig.h (for some building system without running configure) as following: #if ( defined( __APPLE__ ) && !defined( DARWIN_NO_CARBON ) ) || \ ( defined( __MWERKS__ ) && defined( macintosh ) ) /* no Carbon frameworks for 64bit 10.4.x */ #include "AvailabilityMacros.h" #if defined( __LP64__ ) && \ ( MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED <= MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4 ) #define DARWIN_NO_CARBON 1 #else #define FT_MACINTOSH 1 #endif #endif However, I'm not sure whether 10.5.x will set default MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED to 10.5 (system including Carbon) or 10.4 (Carbon-free system). Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel