Dear Sirs,
Thank you for correcting my misunderstanding.
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:39:43 +0800
"Jjgod Jiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/3/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Excuse me, please let me alter the phraseology:
> Mac OS X 10.4.x on Intel Mac can execute 64bit Intel Mac binary?
Yes, I can confirm that, Intel Core 2 Duo (now all upgraded MacBook Pro,
MacBook and iMac using) is 64-bit CPU. Xcode Tools support generating
x86_64 binaries since version 2.4.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:23:37 -0400
"Sean McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07 1:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>it is possible that ppc64 Carbon is still missing in future.
No. Apple has already said that 64 bit Carbon will be for both Intel
and PPC. See:
<http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/64bit.html>
Just I've updated ftconfig.in and ftconfig.h (for
some building system without running configure) as
following:
#if ( defined( __APPLE__ ) && !defined( DARWIN_NO_CARBON ) ) || \
( defined( __MWERKS__ ) && defined( macintosh ) )
/* no Carbon frameworks for 64bit 10.4.x */
#include "AvailabilityMacros.h"
#if defined( __LP64__ ) && \
( MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED <= MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4 )
#define DARWIN_NO_CARBON 1
#else
#define FT_MACINTOSH 1
#endif
#endif
However, I'm not sure whether 10.5.x will set default
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED to 10.5 (system including
Carbon) or 10.4 (Carbon-free system).
Regards,
mpsuzuki
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
