> >It's ugly, but I can live with that since it's the only location
> >which needs this special kind of attention.
> 
> Umm. I must agree - as a workaround for 1 problematic line, the 7 +
> 3 line insertion is too much. Can I replace the insertion by some C
> preprocessor macro (and expand it by somethingh like
> builds/compiler/mwerks-cw.mk) to reduce the insertion length?

I think this is not worth the trouble.

> Do you prefer your original idea: the separation of setjmp- (or
> volatile-) related part to new file and override it by compiler or
> platform specific file?  If so, I will include a patch in docs (as a
> quick fix) and rework for the separation in future.

Feel free to play with such solutions if you can afford time for it.
However, since it really affects this single location, I suggest to
leave it as-is, probably mention the problem somewhere in the doc
files.


    Werner


_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to