Thanks you werner, I did read the second set of patches, and my comments still stand.
Another major issue that I have with the code is that it is very error-prone and very cumbersome to have these 1000 macros for declaring and defining classes. I would really prefer if we could use a simpler scheme that, gasps, relies on the C pre-processor, but at least would make our life easy. This is difficult to explain this without a real example, I'll try to cook one up and post it there shortly. 2009/3/20 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> > > > Can you add some clarification to the ChangeLog of the first patch > > that explain why it is needed ? > > > > Regarding the second patch, [...] > > David, these two patches are superseded by the suite of patches in > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/freetype-devel/2009-03/msg00095.html > > Please comment these instead. It makes his life easier :-) > > > Werner >
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
