Hi,
Here's what I wrote him regarding this request.
Please tell me if you still want me to move these to ftobjs.h?
----------------------------------------------------
Arranging a set of patches where each of them is a meaningful unit of changes
takes a lot of work.
I'll do that again, but I hope that's the last time I have to do that.
Regarding ftimage.h and ftrender.h,
These macros that declared there might be necessary if a user needs to
instantiate an FT_Outline_Funcs or FT_Raster_Funcs or FT_Glyph_Class struct in
his code and needs the code to be compatible with PIC.
Regarding the rest of the changes in ftmodapi.h and ftrender,
I don’t know if a user is expected to implement a renderer or a module
externally (on his own), but if he does then he might need these macros too.
If not, then why are FT_Renderer_Class and FT_Module_Class structs exposed to
the user?
Anyway, if you do decide to move these macros to another header, we can do that
after the current set of patches I'm preparing.
Thanks.
Oran.
-----Original Message-----
From: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:w...@gnu.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 12:06 PM
To: o...@monfort.co.il; freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Searching for an FT2 tester program
David wrote:
> I would also prefer if you do *not* modify public header files (e.g.
> ftimage.h), the corresponding declarations you want to add could
> instead be placed in internal/ftobjs.h
Oran, in case this is still true, please fix it.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
