>> If I've understood James correctly, the new code is actually
>> compiler dependent but the compilers he tested all produce the same
>> result.
>
> To me the code looks like a welcome
> microoptimization/simplification. The result should be the same
> regardless of compiler.
Oh, so it's really me who is dumb :-) If James confirms your
statement, I'm going to replace the code as he has suggested in his
patch..
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
