Just I've uploaded an archive: http://gyvern.ipc.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~mpsuzuki/ooo-ttf-checksum-test.zip
it includes following files: * LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf - a free font including cvt/fpgm/prep tables * LiberationSerif.odt - an ODT document referring LiberationSerif font * LiberationSerif-OO3.pdf - a PDF generated by LibreOffice 3.3.1 to be precisely, OOO330m19 (Build:8) tagged libreoffice-3.3.1.2, Debian package (1:3.3.1-1) * embedded-font.pdf - subsetted & embedded font in the PDF I think this is not Debian specific issue, but reporting the issue by Debian binary to LibreOffice official maintainers won't be welcomed. I will make more official style report for their official bugzilla. But I have to work with other issues before it... Regards, mpsuzuki mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote: > Yes, I should file the bug with yet another sample > with free fonts (NEC FA-xxx fonts are proprietary) > including the clarification you commented. > > Regards, > mpsuzuki > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:23:32 +0900 > Miles Bader <mi...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> suzuki toshiya <mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp> writes: >>> BTW, during the production of sample PDF, I found that >>> OpenOffice.org generates wrong checksum for embedded TTF, >>> so the tricky font detection by the checksum cannot solve >>> the problem :-( >> Could you compare against _both_ the real checksum and the bogus >> OpenOffice.org checksum, and recognize both? [Maybe just add separate >> entries for the "bogus OpenOffice.org version" of these fonts...] >> >> -Miles > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype-devel mailing list > Freetype-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
