Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > Why do you butcher perfectly legal code C-code? > You problem is in the tool - not it in FreeType. This is not fair. The exercise do show some areas in Freetype which code will be clearly made better after the corrections proposed by Vinnie. Examples are the #undef pp-instructions before #define (patches #2, or #5 2nd part); or the correction in cidload.c of the local methods t1_init_loader (resp. t1_free_loader) by cid_init_loader (resp. cid_free_loader) (patch #6.)
I also second Werner thinking this will need a fair amount of editor work, hence time, to be digested. Antoine _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
