Ohh, right. This only proves how the name of this property is misleading.
2013/1/24 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: >>> This has been replaced with >>> >>> ascender_int = round(ascender_26.6); >>> descender_int = round(descender_26.6); >>> height_int = ascender_int - descender_int; >>> >> >> This seems to assume that height_26.6 was always ascender_26.6 + - >> descender_26.6. I'm not sure this is always true. IIRC, there are >> fonts where the line height is actually different from ascender - >> descender, they would be affected by this patch in surprising ways. > > *blush* Uh, oh, I misunderstood what FreeType's `height' value is. > How embarassing. As you correctly state it's *not* `ascender - > descender' but the baseline-to-baseline distance. > > I'll undo the change (and add a comment). Sorry for the noise. > > > Werner > > _______________________________________________ > Freetype mailing list > freet...@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
