He must be talking about the old greyscale antialiasing in the GDI. That
one is better forgotten, it sucked for many reasons, & Cleartype wasn't
that much better because of RGB sub-pixelling, but mainly because it was a
much better antialiaser (& yet not amazing) than the poor old one.

Cleartype is calibrated for a gamma of 1.4 out of the box, & it's
user-adjustable (& stored in the registry as "1400").

(sry I wasn't replying to the list)


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> Dave,
>
>
> thanks a lot for your good demonstration images!
>
> > I believe column 3 is what we want to achieve.
>
> Yes, indeed!  By the way, here is another page which goes into great
> detail on gamma correction and TrueType font rendering:
>
>   http://www.beatstamm.com/typography/RTRCh5.htm#Sec3
>
> It might be interesting to see your tests applied to common TrueType
> fonts also.  Beat Stamm writes about GDI ClearType:
>
>   In Windows, text rendered in full-pixel anti-aliasing is displayed
>   with a gamma correction done in software and using a gamma value of
>   about 2.3 – to determine this γ value, I displayed a gray ramp in
>   Word, inspected the RGB value of middle gray as rendered (189),
>   solved L = V(1/γ) (the formula for γ correction, as opposed to γ
>   response) for γ, and substituted the normalized inspected gray value
>   (189/255) for L while setting V to 0.5 (half the normalized voltage
>   should yield middle gray). Thus γ = log(V)/log(L) =
>   log(0.5)/log(189/255) ≅ 2.314.  This gamma correction appears to be
>   in addition to what my premium graphics chip wants to do.  If I
>   “under-correct” gamma on my graphics chip, all my photos look too
>   dark in their midtones, but text rendered in full-pixel
>   anti-aliasing looks more natural.  If I “correct” gamma for my
>   photos, text rendered in full-pixel anti-aliasing looks “washed
>   out.”  Windows (GDI) does not have any provisions to adjust or
>   defeat the software gamma correction of full-pixel anti-aliasing
>   (“standard font smoothing”).
>
> So it seems that similar problems are affecting even major
> platforms...
>
>
>     Werner
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to