(Oops, I forgot to CC the list) Hi,
thank you for the reply. Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> írta: >I second that. What's most important is caching of the processed >glyphs. This makes sense. If you can cache the results, the interpreter has a fixed, one-time cost. Are these glyphs stored on the disk? >There are three parts: A generic one (in the `fpgm' table, usually >defining functions), a global one (in the `prep' table, to be executed >right after setting a ppem value), and a local one (the real >instructions for every glyph, located in the `glyf' table). Are these programs provided by the font file itself or comes from another source? >No, but hinting is quite slow. Perhaps multithreading can help more here than JIT. I suspect hinting can be done parallelly. Regards, Zoltan _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
