I agree that changing just the fill rule would not change the results. There are other differences, though I do not know what they all are. (This was way before my time at Adobe.)
Other differences include at least dropout and collision control heuristics. Thanks -Dave ________________________________________ From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad.esfah...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 11:17 PM To: Werner LEMBERG; Dave Arnold Cc: freetype-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [ft-devel] GX support now working On 15-06-25 10:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> > The threshold is 400 ppem. Below that size, a "center scan" >> > algorithm is used. It is a newer algorithm than the original scan >> > converter and produces better results. > Please define `better results'. I've always thought that either rule > yields a non-ambiguous result... I read Dave's response as "the new algorithm produces better results at these sizes, and this algorithm happens to use XXX fill rule..." _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
