On 15-08-25 04:30 PM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Behdad Esfahbod > <behdad.esfah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 15-08-25 03:29 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> >>> On the other hand: How many recent fonts in the wild have such >>> misformed glyphs? >> >> I saw one when developing GLyphy. Note that these are valid fonts according >> to TrueType spec. They just don't follow the "recommended" outline >> winding... >> >> Perhaps it's ok to ignore these. Just something to know is possible. > > For the record, Windows 7 rejects this font.
That's probably because my subsetter was too aggressive... > If this mistake was made > in the letter 'O' it wold not be rendered correctly by FreeType. So > this glyph *happens* to render correctly just because the outlines are > not nested. Sure. That's the whole point of non-zero-winding fill rune. > Testing for this is easier said than done. It easier to > fix the font. lol. True. We have to fix these in GLyphy however... b _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
