Hi Behdad, do you have such a font and/or can point me in the direction of one such file? I'll add support for that to the TODO list of you-know-what :-). It doesn't currently parse those those tables, at all. I assume that's because color glyphs is a recent (>2009) addition.
Hin-Tak Message: 2 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:54 -0400 From: Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> To: "freetype-devel@nongnu.org" <freetype-devel@nongnu.org> Subject: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC Message-ID: <561560e2.1020...@behdad.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Werner, Apparently somewhere during the standardization, CBDT/CBLC got their version bumped to 3: https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cblc.htm https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/cbdt.htm FreeType currently only accepts 2, which is the number we used in our proposal. ttsbit.c needs to be updated to accept 3. I suggest we accept both 2 and 3 for both color and non-color versions of this. Or you can only accept 2 for non-color (EBDT/EBLC), and accept both 2 and 3 for color ones. If doing so, you want to disable color in EBDT/EBLC as well.. Whatever you do, please don't break our existing fonts, that is, CBLC/CBDT with version number 2. Thanks! -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
