Dear Alexei,
>> I would consider -D__GNUC__=4 for Solaris too, only if it also
>> supports GNU style assembler and __builtin_clz.
BTW, I'm negative about the idea to add -D__GNUC__=4 to
non-gcc compilers by autotool, cmake, etc.
If we are discussing about the advice for the developers
using non-gnu toolchains and cannot wait the future release
fixing the issue, "please try CFLAGS='-D__GNUC__=4'" is
good.
But, basically, current problem is because of different
switching of visibility control.
In configure, -fvisibility=hidden availability is checked,
on the other hand, in ftconfig.h, __GNUC__ is checked.
It is natural that non-gcc compilers with -fvisibility=hidden
feature fail to compile.
The expected switching would be:
a) check -fvisibility=hidden availability only if
__GNUC__ >= 4.
b) check __attribute__((visibility("default")))__
availability in autoconf (for any compilers) and enable
if it is available, regardless with gcc version.
there are so many gcc-specific features, so making non-gcc
compilers pretend as if it were gcc is too drastic solution.
This is my personal opinion.
Regards,
mpsuzuki
suzuki toshiya wrote:
> Dear Alexei,
>
> Thanks, I received after revising the patch X-)
>
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
>
> Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>>> +#elif defined( __SUNPRO_C ) && __SUNPRO_C >= 0x500
>>> +#define FT_EXPORT( x ) __attribute__(( visibility( "__global" ) )) x
>> Simply,
>> +#define FT_EXPORT( x ) __global x
>>
>> I would consider -D__GNUC__=4 for Solaris too, only if it also
>> supports GNU style assembler and __builtin_clz.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
