On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:06 PM <sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > forgot this! I skimed through the project (then I may be heavily wrong) > and it > seems small enough to allow a re-implementation. >
I wonder if a re-implementation is a good idea. We will have to maintain our re-implementation and keep it in sync with their implementation, won't we? Werner just told me that Adobe is willing to integrate contributed code. Writing a C API wrapper for 'svgnative' seems like a really good idea. If it goes well, Adobe will probably merge it. On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:50 PM Moazin Khatri <moazinkha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:06 PM <sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> forgot this! I skimed through the project (then I may be heavily wrong) >> and it >> seems small enough to allow a re-implementation. >> > > I wonder if a re-implementation is a good idea. We will have to maintain > our re-implementation and keep it in sync with their implementation, won't > we? Werner just told me that Adobe is willing to integrate contributed > code. Writing a C API wrapper for 'svgnative' seems like a really good > idea. If it goes well, Adobe will probably merge it. > > -Moazin >
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
