Dear Sylvain, Excuse me, please let me confirm your intention. Which is the background of "I cannot answer this question by myself".
a) libsvgtiny should be audited from now, because we (including both of you and me) have not audited. b) we (including both of you and me) don't know the required features of SVG in SVG-OT, so it's not the time to discuss "the image element is not supported or not", because we should decide "the support of the image is needed or not" before asking it. which is your position? Regards, mpsuzuki sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 01:44:39AM +0000, suzuki toshiya wrote: >> However, my impression on libsvgtiny is... its range of the features >> might be narrower than SVG Native: I think it does not support >> the image elements in SVG. Am I misunderstanding? > > Hi, > > This is for this very reason this lib should be audited as a svg renderer. The > question of "how much more" this lib needs in order to be able to render > "reasonably" the "font svg subset", would have to be answered. I cannot answer > this question myself. > > Their SDK seems still of a reasonable complexity and size... for the moment. > > regards, > _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel