>
> His concerns stay the same.  He doesn't like `multi-purpose' API calls
> that do more than a single thing, and which use casts to various types
> like the mentioned `ioctl' function.  Having a structure certainly
> reduces possible coding errors, but in the end there is still a cast
> from one type to another, something that disables type checking on the
> compiler level.
>

Thanks a lot for explaining what really is the problem. This really helps.
:)


> However, for the sake of consistency with other module controlling
> stuff, I prefer it how you've implemented it.
>

Okay.
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Reply via email to