Hello, -I have changed the * and the sentence -changed the links to relative > I already changed the working way of the timing. I only start the > benchmark at beginning and stop at the end. i mean, it times chunks, not single iteration.timer starts at the beginning of the chunk and stop at the end (then divide the results size of a chunk). because of it does not time single iteration, it is already a bulk test. > BTW, I suggest that you add another sentence, explaining *why* there > are two values at all. actually, i didnt get the reason well but it may differ even with same flags. i need help in this case.
as i said before, i run the benchmark in mac. it uses this if clause. return 1E6 * (double)clock() / (double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC; the code seems producing more accurate results after splitting the results into chunks. are results seem satisfactory in your machine? Best, Goksu goksu.in On 12 Sep 2023 18:17 +0300, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>, wrote: > > If a value in the 'Iterations' column is given as '*x* | *y*', > values *x* and *y* give the number of iterations in the baseline and > the benchmark test, respectively.