> I'm wondering if there's a typo in the FT_Pos docs, at:
> http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-basic_types.html#FT_Pos
>
> It's described as a *32-bit* integer, but is typedef'd to be a *long*.
> On LP64 systems (Like x64 Linux), a long is actually *64* bits - See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LP64#Specific_data_models
It's a typo, or rather, it stems from the time where nobody took care
of 64bit systems. Thanks for spotting; I've fixed it in the git.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
Freetype@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
