On 22/08/12 07:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> That is, I set the height of the font to 32, thus I expect all >> glyphs to fit within a height of 32. > This is a wrong expectation.
This is actually another question I suppose. What are the sizes I'm specifying when I make a size request? Somehow they must relate to the final size but I'm not sure how. Perhaps this is all that I'm missing. > As mentioned many times on this list, the *only* way to get a smallest > bbox for a string of glyphs at a certain resolution is to call > FT_Load_Glyph for each glyph so that hinting instructions get applied. I don't need an exact size, nor do I need to worry about glyphs that go beyond a typical bounding box. I'm interested only in the typical metrics. If you're saying there is no such thing then fine, it means I have to render the glyphs twice. -- edA-qa mort-ora-y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sign: Please digitally sign your emails. Encrypt: I'm also happy to receive encrypted mail.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
