Hi!
When accessing glyph metrics after loading a new face using FT_New_Face vs. FT_New_Memory_Face, I get much better performance from FT_New_Memory_Face which I am surprised by given at this point the face has been loaded. I would expect loading it the first time from disk is slower but afterwards, accessing other glyph metrics should be the same between the two. Why am I seeing a performance difference here? In addition, after the face has been loaded using FT_New_Memory_Face, I get significant performance differences when accessing glyph metrics between different font files. For instance, getting the metrics for the letter "A" from Arial.ttf is 0.08ms vs. 0.018ms for Segoeui.ttf vs. 0.0035ms using Anton.ttf. Again why the differences here? All these fonts are using Unicode encoding, Arial has about the same number of glyphs as Segoeui so I would not expect much difference here. To load the glyphs, I am using FT_LOAD_COMPUTE_METRICS which I presume is the most efficient option if all I need is metrics for a given size / glyph. I am using FreeType version 2.8.1 right now. Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
