On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Aubin Paul wrote: > 2. A cleanup of the WIP and contrib directories. At my first glance, a > lot looks pretty old, outdated or abandoned.
Well, the spec files and patches in my contrib dir goes all the way back to 1.2.x. If no one objects, I'll remove everything except the current freevo*spec files. > 3. Last, should we have 'runapp' statically linked by default in the > Makefile? It seems a little much for people who are compiling it > themselves, perhaps a different target for people who need a static > compile, and for the runtime. I rebuild runapp and freevo_xwin when I generate the RPM package (via make). I'm not sure if it should be static or shared since it's rebuilt? A quick inspection of the file sizes seem to indicate that freevo_xwin is shared, while runapp is static for the latest CVS snapshot. (Currently I'm using RH 7.3 as my build machine. May change to RH 9 in the future). T.C. ---- Wan Tat Chee (Lecturer) School of Computer Science, Univ. Science Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia. Rm.625 Ofc Ph: +604 653-3888 x 3617 NRG Lab Admin: +604 659-4757 Rm.601-E Ofc Ph: +604 653-4396 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan GPG Key : http://nrg.cs.usm.my/~tcwan/tcw_gpg-20030322.asc F'print : DCF2 B9B2 FA4D 1208 AD59 14CA 9A8F F54D B2C4 63C7 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
