Matthieu Weber wrote:
> On Thu 08.01.2004 at 11:06:09AM +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> Matthieu Weber wrote:
>> > On Wed 07.01.2004 at 11:11:10AM -0500, Michael Ruelle wrote:
>> >> I don't see anything obviously wrong but haven't had time lately to look
>> >> at it. I will put it on my TODO for the weekend. Sorry for the delay,
>> >
>> > No problem. Sorry for complaining :(
>> 
>> You need to complain. Sometimes a patch gets lost, because everone
>> thinks xxx will integrate it. So if you don't complain, a patch will
>> never get integrated.
>
> Yep, but on the other hand, when I complain, I feel like considering
> that my contribution is soooo good that it must be integrated as soon as
> possible. I don't have the pretense to consider my work to be that good
> (especially those q&d fixes I send sometimes).

If you works sucks, don't worry, we will tell you :-)

> Btw, don't miss the two patches I sent this morning ;)

I added one, the second is for Rob.


Dischi

-- 
Reality is for people who lack imagination.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to