Lucian Muresan wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> Damit, my mail yesterday got lost :(
>> 
>> Rob Shortt wrote:
> [...]
>>>Also, have you looked at using a different channels.conf format?  The
>>>one you're using now relies on the DVB name as the defining factor which
>>>isn't that reliable IMO.  The VDR 1.3.x format is consistent accross
>>>DVB-C/S/T I think, and exposes the channels Service ID (SID).
>> 
>> 
>> I was thinking about creating our own channels.conf format, including
>> dvb and analog settings. 
>
> This is getting in the same old direction, re-invent everything. You're
> not to blame for this, as there isn't any universal format for TV
> channels yet, every application has it's own (xawtv, tvtime, xine,
> mplayer, freevo, etc...), and that's a pity. VDR's channel.conf also
> support analogue channels (just by the usge of the present fields, VDR
> itself isn't aware of analog channels), as described in the analogtv
> plugin's documentation.

I didn't know that.

> I don't know if you guys followed the linuxdvb ML, 

not anymore

> but there where
> efforts to unify channel configuration data in a library (I guess at the
> moment it's just in CVS): libdvbcfg, just ahave a look
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/dvb-apps/libs/ . They
> enherited lots of things from VDR 1.3.x. Maybe it is a good moment to
> try to unify all this channel format chaos, then applications could just
> use libdvbcfg and then channel configs may be shared between such
> frameworks of more apps like freevo is, easier. 

Sounds like a good idea. But libdvbcfg has way to much lines. You can
write it much smaller in Python, so I guess we will write a Python
parser for the same config style.

We will take a look at it.


Dischi

-- 
The world is full of willing people -- some willing to work and some
willing to let them. - Robert Frost.

Attachment: pgpePezjojjXy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to