On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 09:35 -0500, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 10:29 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> > I know they are planing to remove lambda, but I guess this would break
> > a lot of code and I still hope they don't do this. 
> 
> Ok, _really_?  Removing lambda is crazytalk.  Unless they plan on
> replacing lambda with something less limited.  But removing anonymous
> functions from Python seems pretty stupid.

I'm fairly certain lambda is going away. GvR hates it.  However, I
strongly suspect that Python will gain true anonymous blocks in the
meantime (or perhaps at the same time).

> Are you sure you're not thinking of map/filter/reduce and not lambda?
> That would make so much more sense.

These are probably going away too, or will at least be relegated to a
module.

Regards,
Cliff



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to