Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:42 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> > The problem with this is there's no way to specify "foo_bar-baz" >> >> No, you can have everything. But in a config file foo-bar looks >> bettwen than foo_bar (IMHO). But you can't access config.foo-bar, so >> we need this. > > But doesn't this mean you can't have a dict key (which you can access as > an arbitrary string) be specified as foo_bar-baz? i.e. if from the app > I do: > > config.somedict['foo_bar-baz'] = 42 > > Won't it be written to the config file as: > > config.somedict[foo-bar-baz] = 42 > > ?
It has nothing to do with a dict, it is the group variable name. So you can't do config.foo_bar-baz, but you can't do it anyway because it is not valid python code. > This would be rather confusing when you subsequently go to load in the > config file and config.somedict['foo_bar-baz'] no longer exists. Or > does this change not affect dictionary keys and only config names that > will eventually be accessed as python variables? (It looked like it > would affect dict keys too.) It should not affect dicts. Dischi -- I believe no problem is so large or so difficult that it can't be blamed on somebody else.
pgp2or79pFdWL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
