On 2008-01-14 10:22, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > Ok, so the usage is: > > some_yield_exec_func().signals['completed'].connect(my_handler) >
Actually no, nevermind. some_yield_exec_func() will return InProgress. I see now what you were actually saying. And I suppose I buy your argument that InProgress and Thread/Process is fundamentally different. I think exception_handler should be renamed to exception_signal, or maybe just exception. I think of a handler as an actual callback, not something you connect a callback to. How about a connect_both() convenience function for InProgress, allowing you to connect handlers to both the result and exception. It could be used when you don't need to pass user args to the callbacks: some_yield_func().connect_both(my_handler, my_exc_handler) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
