Dirk Meyer said the following, on 15/02/2008 10:07: > Duncan Webb wrote: >> BTW I like the async.wait() call it makes life much easier. > > wait should be avoided because it calls step() again. Let me give you > an example: you have a mainloop running (calling step). Now you are in > a callback and call step() to wait. Inside wait you call step again > which will call another callback that also uses step. This means, that > the first step will not return until the second one is done! I hope > you understand it. A traceback would be: > > main > step > callback x > wait > step > callback y > wait > step
Actually, I don't see it, but I guess that it blocks some where and never returns? It's a bit tricky in rel-1 to use the coroutines or callbacks in certain places. I really need co-functions. Duncan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
