On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 15:28 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> > So this calls the function and wraps it in an InProgress object.  Maybe
> > something like wrap_inprogress which is, granted, pretty ugly. :(
> 
> pretty ugly

Yeah, I know. :/

> Maybe I should revert the change and move the execute function back
> into the InProgress class. This would be more generic and can also be
> used for the timed decorator.

I think I'm in favor of reverting.  Calling InProgress().execute() makes
it a lot more clear what it's doing than kaa.execute.

Jason.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to