On Montag 27 Oktober 2008, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:13 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote: > > I did not like monitoring(bool) and neither do I like monitor(bool). I > > I don't like monitoring(bool) either, but monitor(bool) seems fine. And > if nobody is likely to want to disable monitoring, then > monitor(bool=True) seems better.
That's how it was before r3640; note that most of the callers just used
query.monitor() before, which I turned into query.monitor = True now.
If my opinion counts, I like the old syntax better; I think "explicit is
better than implicit" from the Zen holds here, because you just don't *see*
that it's a property when you read "q.monitor = True". (From a language
perspective, I like the fact that it's possible to have properties, but I do
not see many good reasons to use them at all.)
--
Ciao, / / .o.
/--/ ..o
/ / ANS ooo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
