Hi! On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:53:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: dnehring > Date: 2006-12-04 09:53:53 +0100 (Mon, 04 Dec 2006) > New Revision: 1242 > > Modified: > trunk/freewrt/package/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/Makefile > trunk/freewrt/package/bridge-utils/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/broadcom-nas/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/broadcom-wl-util/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/dnsmasq/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/ez-ipupdate/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/iptables/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/openntpd/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/openswan/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/openvpn/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/ppp/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/pptp/Config.in > Log: > Try to revert r976
1. Thx for commenting capi4k-utils out, think it was a little late yesterday. ;) 2. Why revert r976? 3. Those collection specific defaults are part of the new style for defining Package Collections, i.e. on a "free willingly" and "default if not set" base. So if you really want to revert it, you also have to put the selects back into Config.in.collections. 4. Indeed, I did intentionally remove those "default m if devel" statements, on wbx's behalf. So better consult him for that (if you didn't already do so). 5. This fits perfectly into the "update-patches discussion", as everyone fears too less documentation and therefore unmaintainable code. Not always, but in this special case four words are a little less docs, don't you agree? ;) Greetings, Phil
pgppXlU0fOH3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
