On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:38:42PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:37:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: dnehring > > Date: 2007-01-21 22:37:22 +0100 (Sun, 21 Jan 2007) > > New Revision: 1704 > > > > Added: > > branches/broadcom_new/package/broadcom-wl/Config.in > > Modified: > > branches/broadcom_new/mk/netfilter.mk > > Log: > > Forgot Config.in > > > > Modified: branches/broadcom_new/mk/netfilter.mk > > =================================================================== > > --- branches/broadcom_new/mk/netfilter.mk 2007-01-21 03:36:36 UTC (rev > > 1703) > > +++ branches/broadcom_new/mk/netfilter.mk 2007-01-21 21:37:22 UTC (rev > > 1704) > > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ > > > > IPT_NAT-m := > > # FIXME: why is this here? > > -#IPT_NAT-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT) += $(P_V4)ipt_SNAT $(P_V4)ipt_DNAT > > +IPT_NAT-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT) += $(P_V4)ipt_SNAT $(P_V4)ipt_DNAT > > IPT_NAT-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE) += $(P_V4)ipt_MASQUERADE > > IPT_NAT-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MIRROR) += $(P_V4)ipt_MIRROR > > IPT_NAT-$(CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT) += $(P_V4)ipt_REDIRECT > > > > Actually, the comment is mine. Is this needed? I had a setup where these > modules didn't exist, so I commented it out. Do you know further?
Yeah, it is needed for SNAT/DNAT support in iptables. Btw., netfilter.mk has to be fully reworked, it misses man iptables libs. Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
