Milan Holzäpfel dixit:
>> This hack
>> needs to be done in a .c file of the kernel and cannot be set at runtime.
>
>Probably not a solution one would want to do :)
Why not, if the other methods you described don't work?
>I am not sure whether duplicate link-local addresses are a problem. If
>communication via eth0 isn't possible anyway (vlan setup) I think they
>should not do no harm.
I don't think having one IP on two different (practical, not theoretical)
interfaces is something one should try. They may cause harm.
>By the way, does someone know whether we are able to disable generation
>of link-local addresses? In case we simply don't want to use them.
That's not allowed by the standards, AFAIK, and there are
some reasons I don't remember off-hand.
//mirabile
--
"Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."
-- Henry Nelson, March 1999
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
