Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 13:13 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: > >Modified: > > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/shorewall/Makefile > > I don't see you bumping the package patchlevel?
you mean "our version" number? in this case the complete version is "1.3.8-1", so you mean the "-1" part? in fact thats an important point. as far as my packaging expierence goes, this is not needed as long as a package doesn't get really shipped/released. this is the way the debian svn repositories are handling this problem. otherwise, on each minor upgrade the version number needs to be increased, which might look strange, too. I don't really want a 1.3.8-1034 version for example :). People using svn to checkout the source can use the svn revision for identifing their version instead. because shorewall wasn't in a stable branch "release", I thought I doesn't need to increment our version number (or patch-level, or what ever). For example, the WIB doesn't list shorewall and on "http://www.freewrt.org/downloads/1.0/brcm-2.4/packages/"; is no shorewall package either. am I wrong? :) --Ralph > //mirabile _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
