On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:28 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Won't it be easier to just fix the buildscript then?
>
> Send a diff, I'll review and test it on a system that has neither cc nor gcc.
Attatched.
> >I think such constructs add unneeded complexity and abstraction.
>
> Yes, I think that too. Fix the broken build systems. For example
> that of the Linux kernel, if my memory serves me right.
Yeah, don't hack around the problem, solve it at the source.
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
--- Makefile (revision 2312)
+++ Makefile (working copy)
@@ -120,14 +120,6 @@
@env NO_ERROR=${NO_ERROR} BASH="$$(lbin/which bash)" \
CC='${CC}' CPPFLAGS='${CPPFLAGS}' \
bash ${_PX} scripts/scan-tools.sh
- @cc='${CC}'; if test x"$$cc" = x"gcc"; then \
- ln -s $$(lbin/which "$$cc") lbin/gcc; \
- else \
- ( echo "#!$$(lbin/which bash)"; \
- echo "export PATH=$$PATH"; \
- echo "exec $$cc" '"$$@"' ) >lbin/gcc; \
- chmod 555 lbin/gcc; \
- fi
@${GMAKE_INV} tools/install-lbin
@echo '===> Prerequisites checked successfully.'
@touch $@
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
