Hi Dirk,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 at 0:01 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:28:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: wbx
> > Date: 2007-04-24 23:28:22 +0200 (Tue, 24 Apr 2007)
> > New Revision: 2431
> >
> > Modified:
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/docs/handbook/user/handbook.tex
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/broadcom-nas/Makefile
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/broadcom-wl-util/Makefile
> >
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/broadcom-wl-util/files/wireless-broadcom.pre-up
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/broadcom-wl-util/files/wireless-broadcom.up
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/broadcom-wl/Makefile
> > branches/freewrt_1_0/package/peercast/Makefile
> > Log:
> > fix wds+wep and wds+wpa+psk, wpa+psk2 does not work. rename most packages
> > without upstream version number to freewrt release number, remove
> > open+shared mode stuff. what is it anyway? dirk?
>
> Mmh, I don't think this is a good idea. See:
>
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_Equivalent_Privacy
>
> open and shared are the ways how to authenticate to a access point (no
> authentification or shared secret). I would suggest to revert your
> changes.
It is not a question about reverting, it is a question about how we
should implement this. I have just removed noop lines, which some of
our users reported to break there WEP setup. Documentation says
something about open+shared modes, but the startup scripts are just
echo'ing "not implemented".
So what is the correct way using wl to set open, shared or
open+shared mode?
bye
Waldemar
--
don't open your wrt, free it
http://www.freewrt.org
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
