On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:37:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: wbx > Date: 2007-07-14 22:37:40 +0200 (Sat, 14 Jul 2007) > New Revision: 3215 > > Modified: > trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Config.in > trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Makefile > Log: > hi, > we had a longer discussion about this in the past. Today a Unix sysadmin > convinced me to change the policy and add ifconfig and route back as default. > People who need more space, should just disable it in the ADK, they know how > to use it and know how to disable it. "new" users, but old unix people, just > need > route/ifconfig, because it works on every other unix.
Great. I bet in one month parts of FreeWRT will not work without "ifconfig" because new packages will only be tested with the existence of ip and ifconfig. Now there is way more to support. Can we agree to the fact that "ip" is this the default, and all releases can only released if the components works with "ip". I don't want to begin the discussion again about advantages and disadvantages of "ip" vs. "ifconfig" again... Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
