Daniel Klaffenbach dixit: >No, I haven't tried OpenWRT yet - I just love FreeWRT ;)
I haven't ever tried it either ;) >There is one weird thing going on though, lspci reports a 56k modem in the >500gP: >0:06.0 Modem: Broadcom Corporation BCM47xx V.92 56k modem (rev 09) It looks like that is inside the chipset, but not wired. >I changed the Makefile >so it would compile with FreeWRT 1.0.3. Okay, 1.0 branch is nothing I work on (with very few exceptions, like the packages I maintain), so you’ll have to either use trunk syntax or persu- ade Dirk to commit it, he’s taken over the 1.0 branch for now. Still a praise: it’s good to see users lay hand on things themselves, e- specially in a “make yourself an embedded distribution” kit like FreeWRT. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
